Algorithm may tag perfect spot to split proteins | Digital Science
Splitting a protein is a little like splitting an apple. But finding just the right spot—and being able to reassemble it to functionality—is a matter of trial and error. The new algorithm may change that.
Scientists say it could bring them a step closer to using chemical and light signals to create new medical treatments and biosensors.
“My lab is interested in investigating the way cellular life works by targeting the molecular players, such as proteins and RNA, and to this extent, we have been developing tools to control those players,” says Nikolay V. Dokholyan, professor of biochemistry and molecular biology, and pharmacology at Penn State College of Medicine.
“We want to make these proteins respond with certain activities based on the light—optogenetic—or chemical—chemogenetic—signals that we provide. And, so, just by shining a light or adding a chemical, the cell starts to move, or dance, or whatever we want them to do, based on the protein we’re controlling,” says Dokholyan.
Proteins, which are folded into complex 3D structures that look a little like a molecular ribbon candy, play roles in many of the body’s most important processes, including communicating between cells, building DNA, and creating antibodies.
In the past, researchers found that they could split proteins using light and chemical signals, but finding the precise spot to make the split was a matter of trial and error, which would not be practical for actual medical treatments and scientific procedures.
While the process to split a protein is like splitting an apple, but when people split apples they usually don’t have any intention of reassembling the pieces back into a healthy apple, says Onur Dagliyan, research fellow in neurobiology at Harvard Medical School.
“In this particular work, we tried to establish design principles on how one can look at the structure, or sequence of a protein and identify the sites that enable this splitting and reassembling,” Dagliyan says.
As reported in Nature Communications, to find the best sites for protein splits, the researchers analyzed how scientists split several proteins in the past and used that data to create a mathematical model of the protein’s structure, or physical scoring model. The model, then, gave the researchers the ability to find spots that had the best odds for a successful split.
The researchers used the algorithm to identify split sites on a number of proteins, including tyrosine kinase Lyn, guanosine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor, and guanine exchange factor.
The ability to split proteins—and then make them functional again—could have far-reaching implications, researchers say. The team, for example, could see future uses of this technique in therapies such as CAR T-cell therapy, where doctors take patients’ immune cells from their bodies and modify them to kill abnormal cells, like cancer cells. Doctors then reinject these modified cells into the patients.
“If we want to deliver something—an engineered cell, or stem cell, or engineered bacteria cell, for example—to a body for therapeutic purposes, we might not want them to be active all the time,” Dagliyan says.
“You want to turn them off and turn them on, and people in the field are trying to find ways to control those proteins, just to be able control those cells. So, that’s one possibility that might be looked at,” Dagliyan explains.
The process could be used to attach biosensors to proteins that could then help identify not just the behavior of one protein, but how networks of proteins operate, Dagliyan adds.
Splitting proteins would be another tool for medical researchers, says Dokholyan, who adds that his laboratory has helped to developed optogenetic and chemogenetic signaling of individual and groups of proteins.
The researchers have posted the program online at spell.dokhlab.org.
“This is a tool that basically automates the process, so that it won’t help us control just one protein this way, but it will become a whole platform—and this platform is now available for scientists worldwide,” Dokholyan says.
Additional coauthors are from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and the University of Pittsburgh.
Source: Penn State