Scientists Definitely Have Not Found Life on the Moon | Future Tech

Scientists Definitely Have Not Found Life on the Moon

If life existed on the moon, we haven’t found its remains yet.

Credit: NASA

Did life ever exist on the moon? Maybe! Have scientists found evidence of life on the moon? Definitely not.

Why are we talking about this? A new paper was published online today (July 23) in the journal Astrobiology with a thrilling headline: “Was There An Early Habitability Window for Earth’s ?” Its associated press release had an even more exciting title: “Researcher sees possibility of moon life.” Wowza! This is genuinely cool stuff. But it’s important to understand what it’s really saying and what it’s not.

The paper, written by a pair of astrobiologists from Birkbeck College in London and the Technical University of Berlin, offers no evidence that life existed on the moon. In fact, it doesn’t present new evidence of any kind. The paper doesn’t represent the conclusions of any study at all. Instead, it’s an argument, aimed primarily at other scientists, that based on existing research there may have been a period in the moon’s history where living things on its surface wouldn’t have immediately died. [Top 10 Amazing Moon Facts]

Today, the authors write, the moon is totally inhospitable to life. It has, they wrote, “no significant atmosphere, no liquid water on its surface, no magnetosphere to protect its surface from solar wind and cosmic radiation, no polymeric chemistry [the building blocks of life], and it is subject to large… temperature variations.”

In their paper, they pointed to recent research from a number of different sources that suggests this might not always have been the case.

Thanks to the moon’s more volcanically active past, they pointed out, there may have been two periods (one 4 billion years ago, just after the moon formed, and the next 3.5 billion years ago) where the moon may have been a bit more habitable for periods of a few million years.

Volcanic gases could have spewed water vapor onto the moon’s surface, they wrote, especially given recent evidence that the moon has more water than once thought. The same processes might have thickened the atmosphere. The moon might also have formed a magnetic field similar to Earth’s that would have deflected the worst stellar radiation.

That solves three of the key problems with the moon’s habitability. The researchers don’t directly address the moon’s temperature swings again, but perhaps that would have been resolved as well by an atmosphere. Still, there’s one piece missing: the building blocks of life.

No expedition to the moon has ever found amino acids or other chemicals that might link up to form living things, even as similar chemicals have turned up as far away as Mars. Perhaps, the researchers wrote, those chemicals might have formed natively. Otherwise, they might have arrived via asteroid impact, the same process some scientists think seeded the Earth.

This paper is best understood as a call to look for those chemicals more closely on the moon, especially in volcanic deposits dating back to those periods. But for now, there’s no reason to think that life actually existed there. Just that (maybe, perhaps) it could have.

Originally published on Live Science.

You might also like More from author

Comments are closed.